The Ethics of a Shared Social Experience



I may not be a fanatic, but I am one of the more White Hat SEOs I know. So, I started thinking about the practice of asking friends or colleagues to give my content a little push in the social media arena. It begs the question… “Is this Ethical?”

Let be sure we are all on the same page before proceeding. I am speaking about the practice of asking your friends if they will promote one of your articles or blog posts in the social media arena. For Example, when I am done with this post, I shoot and email over to some of my close friends in the industry (or not) and asking them to Digg it, Sphinn it or add it to any number of social media sites. Is this practice wrong?

My first instinct was; it’s cheating so it should be wrong. That passed very quickly and I started to give the issue some real thought. Right away I zero’d in on the term “social” in social media. While site producers claim they don’t like people manipulating their systems, in reality it is using the systems exactly as it was intended to be used. The basic idea in most cases is the sharing of content with one another and interacting in some form around that content. I would not call it manipulation at all, it’s more like “advanced usage”. But some won’t be convinced that easily so let’s break it down a bit.

The Reasoning for Unethical Social Behavior

  1. It disregards a sites terms and conditions
    Counter: I would like someone to show me a T&C at a social media site that prohibits friends from sharing each other’s content. Here, I checked a couple of the bigger ones:
    • Digg.com Terms of Use – #9 under User Conduct has the text “participating in any other organized effort that in any way artificially alters the results of Digg’s services” If your friends like your content and they vote for it, the results are not “artificially altered”. Most of #9 deals with duplicate accounts and the buying of Diggs.
    • Del.icio.us Terms of Service – Nothing even close
    • Sphinn.com Terms – Yeah, can’t find it here either
    • StumbleUpon Terms of Service – It’s a rather long document, so I may have missed something but I couldn’t find it here either.

    So Digg has one that could be construed either way as it is rather vague. So to be safe, tell your friends if they do not like the content to disregard and do not Digg. There, you’re covered.

  2. It can give an unfair advantage
    Counter: In a “social” environment you can’t penalize someone for being the “most social”. If a person didn’t have many friends this strategy would not work. It only becomes an advantage when a profile has many more friends than another. Unprompted, the more popular profile would still maintain more activity as a rule, so how is it unfair?
  3. Manipulates the system and results
    Counter: I guess I don’t understand how it can truly be “manipulation” if you are only using the product as it was intended to be used. Yes, you are being more aggressive in your usage but does this mean it is wrong. If the developers of a site wanted to put restrictions on the activity levels of users they would and any attempt to override those restrictions would be “manipulation”. Until then, it’s just aggression.
  4. It’s an abuse of knowledge and relationships
    Counter: I see an argument which emphasizes the advantage one would have when you have the largest circle of friends and know how to leverage them. Again, I don’t think in a “social” environment you can penalize someone for being the “most social”. The knowledge portion of the argument does not have any merit either, it is common sense if your network is bigger and you use it, you have an advantage.

I was planning a similar list for the other side of the coin, but this post is too long already. Let’s just say that requesting a friend to promote your content socially is no different that asking a buddy to be added to his blogs’ link list. If you have a relationship with that person, it is not unethical to share your content with them and ask them to help spread the word.

I say this in full confidence that my White Hat is still clean.


Article Permalink
http://www.appliedseo.com/the-ethics-of-a-shared-social-experience/
Article Trackback Link
http://www.appliedseo.com/the-ethics-of-a-shared-social-experience/trackback/

Information and Links

Join the fray by commenting, tracking what others have to say, or linking to it from your blog.


Other Articles

Write a Comment

Take a moment to comment and tell us what you think. Some basic HTML is allowed for formatting.

For those who care, no-follows removed.

Reader Comments

I personally feel that you are not manipulating the “system” what so ever. The whole premise of “social” media is that, Social. Everyone that submits content to these sites, such as digg or others will tell one or more people that they have placed new content up. That’s how you get the word out about new content. So if the logic of thinking is if I email my friends and tell them to digg my article is wrong. Then you’re basically saying the foundation of “social” media is flawed, and I would have to disagree with that.

I think this can be taken back to when you were in high school. There is always going to be clicks of people. Some people are popular “The Jocks & Cheerleaders” while some are out casted and not very popular “The Loners”. A online social society is very much the same. You will have people that are more popular and can network more effectively, and you have others that just don’t have that skill.

So I think your hat is still white my friend.

I like the “High School” clicks analogy.

Lee Odden did a great article on “The Currency of Social Networks” at http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/11/currency-social-networks/ this is another good example of how important the use of friends is in the Social Media shpere.

This is a great article. Thanks for the balanced approach. I would also add that with sites such as Digg and Reddit, one or two friends submitting a story is not going to result in a top placement on either of these sites. Having someone submit your story or blog entry only gets you in the race, it doesn’t in any way guarantee a win. Other users of these services will have to see value in the content to push it up to the top.