<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter has a Duplicate Content Problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.appliedseo.com/twitter-has-a-duplicate-content-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.appliedseo.com/twitter-has-a-duplicate-content-problem/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:15:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Able</title>
		<link>http://www.appliedseo.com/twitter-has-a-duplicate-content-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-10273</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Able</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appliedseo.com/archives/twitter-has-a-duplicate-content-problem/#comment-10273</guid>
		<description>Does this mean you&#039;re twitter-itter-itter-itter-pated over duplicate content content?

As far as I&#039;m concerned, twitter is one place where diluted is not a bad thing.  Just imagine &quot;SEO for Twitter.&quot;  [involuntary shiver]  Oh the twit-humanity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean you&#8217;re twitter-itter-itter-itter-pated over duplicate content content?</p>
<p>As far as I&#8217;m concerned, twitter is one place where diluted is not a bad thing.  Just imagine &#8220;SEO for Twitter.&#8221;  [involuntary shiver]  Oh the twit-humanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
